Dark Crimes Movie Review

ā€˜Dark Crimesā€™ is a thriller by Alexandros Avranas a young director with only five credits to his name. With this and Carreyā€™s exceptional performance, those five will soon be a thing of the past. The film marks Jim Carreyā€™s return to the screen after the unremarkable, ā€˜Dumb and Dumber Toā€™ received a collective thumbs down from audiences everywhere. Pulling away from the genre, ā€˜Dark Crimesā€™ is in no way similar to the comedic roles heā€™s known for. With this project Carrey has chosen for himself an incredibly persecuted soul in his character, Tadek, to show us that heā€™s more than just a jester here for our amusement.

Tadek wants to reopen an investigation into the sex crimes and unsolved murder of a businessman that he had previously been involved in. While learning what that investigation is about, the film gets sinister fast. It starts rather brutally in a world most believe, unfortunately, exists somewhere. One where young women are imprisoned, raped and tortured for menā€™s pleasure. This life goes on in the dark, in secret, behind thick walls and gates. This investigation takes us into what is known as ā€˜The Cageā€™ as he wanders through it. Heā€™s sickened by the cold, dark, foul-smelling conditions the girls had been, until no longer desired, housed in.

ā€˜The Cageā€™ has since been shut down but there are tapes the owner of the building has that come in useful. Tadek finds that not only are videotapes of the goings on in such a despicable place helpful but he stumbles across the details in a book by author Krystov Kozlow (Csokas) that exactly outline everything he is investigatingā€¦ right down to how the body is tied up, information previously unreleased to the public.

His mission now? To link Kozlow to the murder that heā€™s certain he committed. Tadek listens to an author read audiobook every moment he can. In the book, Kozlow details what goes on in sex-clubs stating that there were no rules. You could beat the girlā€™s half to death if you wanted but youā€™re not to kill them because though the girls understood that rape was just a transaction, ā€˜Corpses didnā€™t look good in makeup.ā€™

Thereā€™s a scene about halfway through the film where Tadek and Kozlow go head to head that reveals Carreyā€™s depth. The two are playing mind games, both eager to show the other that theyā€™re the strongest bull in the pen. Through the introduction of Kasia (Gainsbourg), who is also Kozlowā€™s girlfriend, itā€™s exposed that Tadek has some inner demons heā€™s never let escape. Itā€™s here where the audience is given a glimpse into, though heā€™s disgusted by Kozlow more and more, how similar the two men might be. Getting rid of Kozlow may bury his own personal hellion or will it unleash it?

In the end, we find that Tadek and the audience is played from several different directions. Though itā€™s slow and its lighting is as dark as the story, if youā€™re a fan of thrillers and of Carreyā€™s, itā€™s worth seeing. Pay close attention because instead of quickly paced three to five-second cuts, Avranas has you watch a story unfold using plenty of dialogue and close-ups. Often times itā€™s not exactly clear as to whatā€™s going on so be sure your mind doesnā€™t wander and youā€™ll be able to keep up. I must also mention that ā€˜Dark Crimesā€™ has a great ending that, in fact, made me clap. Well done, Avranas. Iā€™m looking forward to more of your work.

 

*In Phoenix, watch it exclusively atĀ AMC Arizona CenterĀ and EVERYWHERE On Demand!

Anything Movie Review

If youā€™re interested in a narrative that has layers and depth, you need to see ā€˜Anything,ā€™ a film that represents anyone who has ever loved for any reason and who will give of themselvesā€¦ anything. Itā€™s a moving piece because we can all relate to the characters and their powerful emotions of love. I say this with certainty as weā€™ve all, for the most part, experienced a love where we have given and where we have received.

The characters in the film are complex and more intricate then one might think based on the pedestrian one-word title it was saddled with. However, that word, as you can tell based on what Iā€™ve written so far, plays an important role in the overall message of the story.

The main character is Early Landry. Heā€™s a middle-aged widower, played by character actor John Carroll Lynch of ā€˜Fargo,ā€™ who easily manipulates the audience into seeing this individual as both the prey and the preyed upon. At the moment Early is introduced to us, weā€™re seeing him through the eyes of his overbearing sister, Laurette (Tierney). Heā€™s depressed, suicidal and since the passing of his wife, needs some love and support, but not as much or the kind Laurette has in mind. Not really giving him much of a choice in the matter, she makes him aware of the fact that she wants him to move in with her so she can help him with his feelings of despair and with settling things from his old life in Mississippi to his new life with her in L.A. Early does move in with her. Though he doesnā€™t speak up for himself, itā€™s not hard to tell that heā€™s quickly growing tired of her. She speaks to him and treats him as if he were a child and itā€™s not long into his stay that he decides he has to move out and be on his own.

Without informing her, he gets himself a little apartment in an area of town she wouldnā€™t approve of. This is most likely done to keep her away. In a short time, he meets his transgender neighbor Freda Von Rhenburg (Bomer), who works the streets and often gets into trouble with men and when money gets tight. Being the gentleman that he is, heā€™s there for her, no matter what she needs and a hot and cold relationship develops. It doesnā€™t take long for them both to see whatā€™s good about the other and how deeply they need what the other has to offer. Perhaps at first getting to know Freda just might be the right thing to agitate Laurette but if thatā€™s what he had in mind then he was just as surprised by the materialization of their romance as we, the audience, are.
Theyā€™re an odd pairing but the performances both actors give to their roles accommodates the concept of their love and what the significance of a man from Mississippi being open-minded enough to accept the love of a man means today. I highly recommend this even though an obvious misstep is not casting a transgendered actress in the role of Freda. Regardless, Bomer is exceptional and deserves to be seen.

 

Opening in Phoenix atĀ HARKINS VALLEY ART

Measure of a Man Movie Review

The film ā€˜Measure of a Manā€™ is an adaptation of the book ā€˜One Fat Summerā€™ by Robert Lipsyte. Itā€™s directed by Jim Loach, whose father Ken Loach has been working in the film business for over fifty years. Seeing this movie makes me certain Jim will have the same kind of staying power. Jim had writer David Scearce write the screenplay and make some changes to it to create a more relatable world for him to work with. Doing this has made his twenty-second directing achievement a triumph. His casting choices also helped. Topping off a fabulous cast of young actors whom you may not know quite yet is Judy Greer, Luke Wilson and the crĆØme de la crĆØme, Donald Sutherland.

ā€˜Measure of a Manā€™ is set in the 1970ā€™s and is a story about an awkward teenager, Bobby Marks (Cooper), trying to fight bullies and his own lack of confidence to grow up and become a man. Depending on how one interprets that, what he wants to do is be helpful to those around him and be a good person but has so much anxiety, he can barely help himself. Heā€™s overweight, uncomfortable in his own skin and outside of his mother (Greer) and sister Michelle (Liberato), is too nervous to talk to girls, save one, Joanie (Danielle Rose Russell), who he grew up knowing. He knows Joanie because his family gets together every year with hers after upstate travel for summer vacation brings them together for picnics, swimming and county fairs. The chubby kid certain that one day her acceptance of him over summer break will blossom into love.

However, this summer, things are different. A lot has changed. Bobby hasnā€™t changed but other things have and heā€™s even more uncomfortable. The people upstate have finally let the vacationers know what they think of their visitors, the locals are harsher and less tolerant of the mess they leave and find an easy target in Bobby to take it out on. Joanie frightens Bobby more than anything a thug could do to him. She has matured and is now taking off for a month and wonā€™t explain to him why. Heartbroken, he gets a summer job helping Dr. Kahn (Sutherland) with his lawn and basic yard maintenance. Itā€™s this relationship that becomes the turning point of the film. Kahn is a rich elite who you think is being severe but you come to realize, through his own experience, heā€™s guiding him into manhood. Kahn also accidentally stumbles onto a sort of friendship he wasnā€™t quite expecting.

The characters in the film are well thought out and the acting is convincing. Bobby and Michelleā€™s relationship as brother and sister is hateful yet compassionate and Cooper and Liberatoā€™s performances are spot on. Loach is largely to thank for pulling performances out of his young cast that keep you both amused and captivated. When feeling for the poor youngster, youā€™ll also feel inflamed when heā€™s confronted with more than he can handle. I like the movie and believe you will, too. Jim Loach knows how to handle a story. This movie is potent and effective and one not to miss. Include ā€˜Measure of a Manā€™ in YOUR summer vacation films.

Playing in Phoenix Exclusively at *Harkins Camelview

READ MY INTERVIEW WITH JIM LOACH AND LIANA LIBERATO

Measure of a Man movie poster

Interview with Jim Loach and Liana Liberato from the film ‘Measure of a Man’

Following in his director fatherā€™s footsteps, Jim Loach has become an outstanding storyteller. His father is the well-known director, writer, producer Ken Loach, who directed last yearā€™s impressive film ā€˜I, Daniel Blakeā€™ among countless others. Read more

Disobedience Movie Review

The movie “Disobedience” is a deep dive into the inner workings of an Orthodox Jewish enclave located in London. The focus is on two women, and how the community reacts to the sexual attraction between them. The pacing of the story is slow and methodical, as the ramifications of their forbidden love spreads even deeper. Since one of the stars is Rachel McAdams, the shortcut title might be “The Notebook for Orthodox Jewish Lesbians”. All that is missing is the kiss in the pouring rain and the swans on the lake…

Ronit (Rachel Weisz) is the daughter of the main rabbi in a small London Jewish community. The elder rabbi is much respected, and Ronit is estranged from everyone in the Orthodox group. She has moved far away and does not communicate with anyone from back home. That is, until the rabbi dies suddenly. She is informed that he has passed away, and she decides to make a trip from New York back to her old community. That is, if anyone there will put up with her. There was some undefined incident that caused the falling out with her father and the rest of the people. But she comes back and stays with a childhood friend.

That friend is Dovid (Alessandro Nivola) who is a young man getting setup to be the new rabbi for the community. He is married to their childhood friend Esti (Rachel McAdams) who is the one that secretly contacted Ronit. Dovid is surprised to see Ronit return, because he thought that nothing would make her come back to the place that caused her so much pain. Esti is secretly pleased, because she and Ronit have a hidden past of passion and love. It was this relationship that caused Ronit to leave in the first place.

Passions get reignited and emotions get all tumbled when Esti and Ronit reconnect. The community around them start to get wind of the underground love affair that has rekindled. Dovid becomes very angry and at the same time confused. The things that Ronit assumed would be part of her father’s will that he would leave to her are instead being funneled to the synagogue. So, she left with nothing, and she is coming back for nothing. Only the subversive and illicit love between her and Esti will bring her anything resembles joy. Yet the passion that connected them is tearing apart the community in which they live.

The keys of this movie are ‘The Two Rachels’, Rachel Squared as it were. Rachel Weisz and Rachel McAdams are very enlightening as the two leads, Ronit and Esti. They pour a lot of talent into the lost and longing looks and steely gazes of the two characters. They are the reason that a very mediocre story line can be enhanced into a higher level of viewing. Also, Alessandro Nivola does a very fine job as the poor guy who gets stuck in the middle of something that he does not understand. Every other actor is well suited to be a typical Jewish community member. Perhaps a bit too stereotypically, in some of the cases.

This will, in most cases, be a must-see movie for a very small and select slice of the audience. It does have two strong female leads. They are in a very interesting situation where they rebel against a very traditional religion. But for a clear majority of people, it might be a little languid in the pacing of the movie. It might also be a little non-specific in the final resolutions. There are many loose ends, and many times an audience likes to see most of the situations wrapped up. There is not a huge excitement factor in the plot or the pacing. The movie simply exists to give ‘Rachel Squared’ a platform to give a very powerful pair of performances.

In Phoenix, playing exclusively at Harkins Camelviewā€¦

Tully Movie Review

Going into ā€˜Tullyā€™ I didnā€™t know what to expect. Sometimes when I know ahead of time that Iā€™ll be reviewing a film, I avoid all mention of the said film, so I can go in without any knowledge of the concept and therefore donā€™t build any preconceived notions. I especially avoid trailers as I believe, this is especially true of the last few years, they give away too much of the plot. Iā€™ll try not to reveal too much here, myself.

What I knew of ā€˜Tully,ā€™ and all I needed to know to sell me on it, were the stars, the director and the writer. Charlize Theron, Mark Duplass and Ron Livingston in a film directed by Jason Reitman who directed the wonderful ā€˜Up in the Airā€™?! Enough said! But then written and produced by Diablo Cody, too?! Cody first came on the scene when she wrote her smash hit film ā€˜Junoā€ for which she procured a BAFTA, Writers Guild, Critics Choice and Academy AwardĀ® for Best Original Screenplay. Quite the accomplishment. ā€˜Junoā€™ was also directed by Reitman. ā€˜Young Adult,ā€™ which I considered to be rather good, as well, Sees Cody and Reitman together also and stars Charlize Theron. Knowing this, I was chomping at the bit for this new film. Still I refused to learn too much of the story, instead, I went in trusting the team that designed the piece. I had heard all I needed to know to get me in the theatre and should do it for you, too. Reitman and Cody make a good team. ā€˜Tullyā€™ is very well written, quite charming and whether you think you can relate to the characters or not, very much worth your time.

Theron plays Marlo, a pregnant mother of two, whoā€™s about to have baby number three shortly. One of her children, her son, has difficulties in school, shows all the signs of autism, and makes getting through the day quite a struggle. She has to brush his body to reduce the anxiety of everyday stimulation for him. Her husband Drew, played by Ron Livingston, of ā€˜Office Spaceā€™ fame, works a lot and when home he spends more time playing video games than he does noticing if Marlo has had a good day, is okay or needs his help. He is a good father and they do have a loving relationship, but their communication is more about the kids and problems that arise rather than relaxed and problem free. Then, of course, when she has the baby things get more chaotic for Marlo and, seeing less of him, she begins feeling drained and sleep deprived.

Her concerned and very wealthy brother Craig, played by the charismatic Mark Duplass, offers to pay for Marlo to have a night nanny come over in the evenings and help her. This is so she can get some rest and be more prepared to handle the sunrise. At first, the idea of someone coming into her home and taking care of her child doesnā€™t thriller Marlo but she eventually finds herself unable to dig herself out from underneath mounds of housework piling up around her. She feels neglectful and, realizing how good itā€™ll be for her family to have someone help, she accepts the generous gift.

This is when Tully, (Mackenzie Davis from ā€˜Blade Runner 2049ā€™), a young woman in her twenties, enters her life. Still a little nervous about the situations, when she finally meets Tully she feels genuine warmth come from her. Knowing that all will be well, Marlo puts her head on the pillow, closes her eyes and gets the first good nightā€™s sleep she’s had in years.

As the relationship deepens and the help she’s receiving becomes more about the bond between the two women, their conversations and the film itself gets more engaging. It’s also considerably witty. Whether youā€™re a woman or have been a parent or not, youā€™ll enjoy the banter between all the characters in the film. The Reitman/Cody union has always been strong and this time itā€™s not only good but has matured, as well. A twist they throw at you at the end of the film is not only kept well-hidden but is a testimonial to how Cody has evolved as a writer which makes you giddy for her future work. Whatever she has coming up for us, hopefully, sheā€™ll not stray too far from her formula and from these partnerships that work.

For more information, visit the website and check out the social pages:

Official Website:Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā http://www.tullyfilm.com/

Facebook: Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā https://www.facebook.com/tullymovie/

Twitter: Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  @TullyMovie

Instagram:Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  @TullyMovie

#Tully

Kings Movie Review

The movie “Kings” is an attempt to tell the story of the LA riots in 1992. It zooms in to a close-up level on a black foster mother raising quite a few kids while living in the South Central section of LA. After the beating of Rodney King, there were four cops on trial for the incident. The verdict came back ‘not guilty’, and much of the town exploded in violence. Black people were outraged and took to the streets in droves.

Mille (Halle Berry) somehow has seven or so children in her care. She gets some money from the state for raising the kids, but she also gets some more cash by selling bundt cakes. Which is a very black thing to do, I hear. There are some her kids with names, but there are so many it all seems a blur of who is who.Ā  There is an incident at night where Millie pulls another young black boy off the streets, who is being stopped by the cops. She just takes him in and that’s that. Also, there is some young black girl who drops out and maybe gets involved in a gang, but it is not clear.

 

There is a neighbor who lives alone named Obie (Daniel Craig) and he is one of the only white men left in that part of the city. He plays classical music (it figures) and he gets annoyed when Millies younger boys play ball in the alley. There is one day when Mille is mad at the three younger boys and tells them to stay outside, because they misbehaved will not get supper. Obie sees them and takes the three smaller kids in and gets them some food and cares for them. Millie is panicked, but she sees that her grumpy neighbor has a softer side.

The weeks go on and there is a rising sense of tension, until the verdict comes in from the trial. Then a match that has been thrown onto a puddle of racial gasoline ignites the city into flames. There are roving gangs of violent gangs and multiple stores being looted. There are multiple fires across the city, and the firemen and policemen cannot come out to save structures or people. The raw power of hatred has overcome society, and Millie and Obie are trapped in the middle.

This movie very uneven and it has a place that it wants to get to. But it never seems to get to that place. In a time where there are major true stories to tell (LA race riots), this movie would rather serve up a weak fictional story of a black mother and some white guy. There is a very awkward sort-of romance that is tacked onto this relationship. But that does not feel deserved at all. The characters of each of the kids is so fuzzy that I could not tell which black teenage foster son was the ā€˜good sonā€™ and which was the ā€˜mean streets sonā€™.

 

And there is no indication of that silly movie title and what it means. ā€œKingsā€™, does that mean LA Kings, the NHL team in LA? Does it mean that LA cops see all the inner-city black dudes as ā€˜Kingsā€™, as in a bunch of Rodney Kings? Does it mean there was a defective deck of cards, and it contained only face cards, the ā€˜Kingā€™ type card? Inquiring minds what to know!

 

If this movie wants to see what an excellent movie about a race riot looks like, then they can check out ā€˜Detroitā€™. It is a movie from last year, but it also had some similar themes of racial injustice and black rage. This movie ā€œKingsā€™ is a Hallmark version of a real gritty, down-to-earth expose of a race riot.

 

Playing in Phoenix area at Harkins Shea 14

STARZ-drama-VIDA

STARZ drama VIDA Advance Screening Viewing Party

Advance Screening Summary

Two Mexican-American sisters return to their old neighborhood in East Los Angeles, where they are confronted by the past when they learn the shocking truth about their mother’s identity..

https://www.warnerbros.com/game-night

See more advance movie screenings from tmc

Advance Screening ForĀ STARZ drama VIDA

Find your chance to receive special advance screening passes below.

Ā 

Phoenix, Arizona

Special pre-release event viewing party for the new STARZ drama VIDA.

The first two episodes of VIDA will be shown at this event, and everyone attending will receive a complimentary small popcorn/drink combo.

Movie Screening Date: Thursday,Ā May 3
Location: Harkins Christown
Movie Screening Time: 7:00pm
Rating: Unrated (no one under 17 years of age will be admitted)
Running Time: 60 minutes
[button link=”http://www.gofobo.com/tmciovida” type=”big” newwindow=”yes”] Get Passes[/button]

Advance Movie Screening Information

To redeem a pass, simply click the Get Passes button. You will taken to our movie screening partner site (where you can sign up for a free account). Once you’ve done so, you’ll be able to print out your pass and bring it with you to your screening or event.

Admittance into a screening or event is not guaranteed with your pass. Events and advance screenings are filled on a ” first come, first served ” basis. To ensure that you stand a good chance of being admitted, we recommend that you show up 30 minutes to one hour early.

The number of admissions that are permissible for each pass are printed clearly on the ticket that you print out. You are allowed to bring as many guests as is indicated on your pass. For example, if your pass is for ” Admit Two, ” you can bring yourself and one guest. If you have an ” Admit One ” pass, you can bring only yourself.

If you have any otherĀ questions or comments, please contact us.

Backstabbing for beginners movie

Backstabbing for Beginners Movie Review

Director Per Fly opens his film by showing the Iraqi people and their blind loyalty to the dictator, Saddam Hussein and most importantly, their unwillingness to see him as the monster that he is. Itā€™s a brilliant move to put on display how easy it is for people, though their leader is taking their country into decline and them personally into poverty, malnutrition and slavery, follow anyway, refusing to believe the person they support would do anything to harm them. Itā€™s very much what we are now witnessing all over the world, even in America where it was never thought possible. This movie was made to help us understand the importance of Civics being taught in our schools, something being pulled from todayā€™s curriculum to the detriment of the people and of the state.

Set in New York in September of 2003 and based on a true story, ā€˜Backstabbing for Beginnersā€™ tells the story of a brave young whistleblower named Michael Sullivan (James). Michael, whose father was his hero, desperately wanted to follow in his footsteps. In order to do that, he needed to work to try and help people. His father, a diplomat, died in a bombing at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut when Michael was only five. He worked at the United Nations and spoke of how the U.N. was founded and why it was so important for the world that it exists.

Now, at age twenty-four, Michael finally lands his dream job as a program coordinator working for Pasha (Kingsley), the Under-Secretary-General of the U.N., as his special assistant. Pasha runs the largest humanitarian program in U.N. history, Oil-for-Food. The Oil-for-Food program was started in the late 1990ā€™s to grant Iraq enough oil to purchase food and necessities to its people. Once the Gulf War began, sanctions were imposed and the nation got sicker and poorer.

Michael feels privileged to be working in the office in charge of trying to feed over twenty million starving people, however, instead of honor, virtuosity and the law working to help those in need of support, what he finds is corruption, thievery and bribes. Only some of the money goes to the people, a large chunk of it benefits those at the top. Michael is hired to look for any inconsistencies and to make sure everything is by the book. Working on his first report to hand into Pasha, he finds a great deal of skimming off the top, service fees that donā€™t add up and kickbacks that need to be investigated. Michael explains how up to or more than 30% of the funds is missing, not to mention that the Kurds are getting skipped for more money to go to Husseinā€™s hometown. Pasha takes the report and shreds it.

Pasha tells Michael to choose his truths wisely. Michaelā€™s very naĆÆve heart is crushed. Pasha, a good man, does what he can but also does for himself. Heā€™s okay with corruption, justifying everything by saying that heā€™s happy thereā€™s decreased malnutrition and starvation and that people are getting the staples. Christina Dupre, (Bisset), an officer at the U.N. is tired of the payoffs and malfeasance and she intends to fix things. Michael finally wises up when Christina, who refuses to falsify her report as Pasha does, ends up meeting an untimely death. Michael is also offered a bribe and is told by Nashim (Bilgin), that his predecessor didnā€™t die in an ā€˜accident.ā€™

This is an important film for idealists to see and should be regarded as a reminder of what we all have to lose if we donā€™t keep our eye on the ball. It doesnā€™t matter the country in which you live, power corrupts and if weā€™re not paying attention, we, like the Iraqi people found out, can crash into anarchy. Twenty billion dollars of the Food-for-Oil money got diverted from the program and everyone seemed to profit. No one, Michael found out, no matter how much you may like them, can be above suspicion.

At least some good came out of Michael getting the position he held. He went to the Wall Street Journal and told his story of finding oil vouchers worth billions and even handed them a list of names he had procured. He went on record, as well, adding that he needed to take responsibility and give his name. Someone had to own what was going on to lend the story the credence it needed to be trusted. What he did led to the largest and most significant changes in the U.N.

The movie has a love scene that doesn’t really seem to fit. Once you’re involved in the story and getting to the truth of things, it’s really the last thing you want to see. Theo James is also not a strong enough actor to show the emotion the part truly needed and Michaels gullible nature and naivete does get old but for the larger part of the story, even though it works some to explain that most of those about to lose democracy are indeed Michael (not aware of what’s going on around them) this is a must-see because the message is too important not to be.Ā 

*ā€™Backstabbing for Beginnersā€™ opens exclusively at AMC Arizona Center

Godard Mon Amour Movie Review

The filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard, who this movie is about, has said of this Michel Hazanavicius film that itā€™s ā€˜A stupid, stupid idea.ā€™ This quote is then put on the poster and why not? Hazanavicius knew right there that he got it right. You canā€™t get a bigger endorsement, in my opinion. Michel Hazanavicius, director of ā€˜The Artist,ā€™ which won five Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director, now gives us the fairly humorous ā€˜Godard Mon Amour,ā€™ a subtitled French film originally titled ā€˜Le Redoutable.ā€™ In ā€˜The Artist,ā€™ he showed us the world of silent films by introducing us to one of its actors and focusing heavily on that starā€™s world. In ā€˜Godard Mon Amour,ā€™ we meet a truly innovative filmmaker from the 1960ā€™s named Jean-Luc Godard (Garrel) when heā€™s in a state of flux. Already a successful director in the eyes of the public and of the critics with films such as, ā€˜Breathless,ā€™ ā€˜Contemptā€™ and ā€˜Pierrot le Fouā€™ he decides he wants to be a revolutionary. He wants more out of life and desires to give more to the world through cinema.

We meet him in 1967 when Godard was regarded as one of the most gifted directors of his generation. He was very avant-garde because about ten years previously, he got involved in the ā€˜Nouvelle Vague,ā€™ a group of French movie directors who came together to shrink away from the cinema of the day that was being created, to give films a more expressive voice.

While making his new movie, ā€˜La Chinoise,ā€™ he starts doubting everything he has ever believed in. He feels heā€™s old (heā€™s thirty-seven) and out of touch and marrying an actress Anne Wiazemsky (Martin) almost twenty years his junior, doesnā€™t help much. She falls in love with his passion and his talent but as he gets more distracted with his heavy interest in politics, he pays less and less attention to her, at one point telling her that love can wait for later. He is always speaking as though his life means nothing but the cinema and when he has switched to politics only, his love life falls in order. He tells her he doesnā€™t have it in him to make a romantic film, saying, ā€˜Enough with the dictatorship of sentimentsā€¦ sentiments donā€™t make revolutions.ā€™ While loving and attentive early on, as the film continues, she’s starting to see what this means for their future. Previous to marrying him, she thought he was fascinating, unpredictable, charming and funny but before long comes to grip with the fact that heā€™s miserable and therefore incapable of thinking of anyone but himself. To support her husband, the young bride finds herself running from the police during student marches and protests rather than making films with him, even boycotting the Cannes Film Festival during the strikes of the following year.

The cinematography is outstanding and worth watching for that alone. The comedy, when it kicks in, rivals that of early Woody Allen pictures but takes place so far into the film that you may lose interesting getting there. Like the filmmaker Godard himself eventually became, Hazanavicius, is looking for something other than a joke to entertain you. Iā€™d like to go on record as saying that if the film doesnā€™t please your palate right away, donā€™t give up on it. It drags on at first but does get better. Thereā€™s a lot of ground to cover and the clever way that this profound character is revealed at such a heavy turning point in his life, shouldnā€™t be missed by anyone who is looking for something meaningful. Hazanavicius is relaying to his audience a time when the filmmaker was trying to stay relevant. Heā€™ll be criticized for creatively yet harshly revealing this time in Godardā€™s life but it doesnā€™t mean it should not have been explored.

*Releasing in Phoenix exclusively at Harkins Camelview at Fashion Square.